Panchkula

3 January 2019

DIVYA AZAD

In the first case of its kind, in the entire country, the practice of taking charges for carry bags/packing by restaurants and shops from consumers, has been held to be unfair trade practice by a local consumer court. The restaurant, Hot Millions Panchkula has been directed to pay a penalty amount of Rs.2200/- to the complainant and also refund Rs.10/- to the complainant along with interest @9% per annum w.e.f. filing of present complaint i.e. 13.02.2018 till realization.

Earlier, Sapna Vasudeva of Sector 10 Panchkula had filed complaint that on 09.12.2017, the complainant ordered four takeaway dishes for lunch. The order was placed at the cash counter and paid an amount of Rs.1197/- as bill price. After making the payment, the complainant noticed a charge of Rs.10/- with the title “PK” and upon asking the cashier, he told that he has levied the packing charges as the order is takeaway order.

Counsel for Hot Millions said that the complainant was charged for the ‘Packing’ which is legal. Restaurant can charge for extra services offered to their customers.

Advocate Sapna contended that a restaurant does not charge for the utensils when the food is served in the restaurant and thus, it cannot charge for the packing if the order is takeaway; service cost and packing cost are deemed to be included in the menu price mentioned as MRP; like food cannot be served without utensils, likewise, it cannot be taken-away without packing. It is further averred that such a charge is nowhere mentioned in the menu or anywhere in the restaurant. This act and conduct of the restaurant amounts to unfair trade practise.

The Forum headed by President Satpal observed that “the complainant has no dispute with regard to the charging of price in respect of eatable items except the charging of Rs.10/- on account of packing material. The complainant has drawn the attention of this Forum towards the cash memo dated 27.05.2018 vide which home delivery of food items was allegedly made by the OP without charging any packaging amount. The complainant has contended on the basis of copy of menu that there is no provision of charging of any amount for the purposes of packaging.

“We have perused the cash memo vide which the food items were obtained by the complainant from the cash counter of the OP and an amount of Rs.10/- was paid by her on account of packaging whereas no such amount on account of packaging has been charged by the OP while providing the food items through the services of home delivery. Having perused the said cash memo vide which Rs.10/- on account of packaging has been charged, we find that no code number has been assigned by the OP to the item of packaging whereas the code items have been assigned to other eatable items. Further, the Menu containing the details of food items with code number and price is silent about the charging of any amount for the packing material. Further, we find no reasonable and plausible justification for the OP to charge the amount on account of packing when the food items are delivered from the cash counter of the restaurant whereas nothing on account of packing material is charged by the OP while delivery of food items is made at the very door step of its customers.

We find no hindrance or impediments on the part of OP to clearly specify about the charging of amount on account of packaging with price and code number in its Menu so as to apprise its customers like the present complainant about the charging on account of packing before giving the order for takeaway meal etc. In View of the above stated facts, we may safely conclude with a reasonable degree of certainty that there has been lapse and deficiency on the part of OP while delivering services to the complainant; hence, the complainant is entitled to relief.”

Consumer Activist Pankaj Chandgothia, while welcoming the order, termed it as a victory for the consumer movement in India. “This will stop the exploitation of consumers by MNCs like Lifestyle, Shoppers Stop, Dominos and Westside who are forcing consumers to pay for shopping carry bags and packings”

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.